Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory, Volume 1

Front Cover
Macmillan and Company, 1890 - Capital - 431 pages

Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk discusses the history and principles of interest, offering piercing critiques of failed theories and implementations from past eras.


The author's investigations range as far back as antiquity and the Middle Ages; how civilizations of old dealt - or failed to deal - with interest in concept and practice. Interest is earned on existing capital, without the owner of said capital engaging in work or activity, an example being money invested in government bonds. Why this income should exist is the initial question posed, and an answer is sought through investigating several facets of the economy.

Böhm-Bawerk's thesis is lengthy and meticulous, ranging across theories of production, the uses with which capital can be employed, the relevance of labor and ideas put across by scholars. He investigates the relationship of interest to debt, exploring whether interest itself is a rent on capital, and what this means in the short and long term. The author is keen to address and debunk ideas, such as the Marxist notion that the interest earned with capital is a manifestation of worker exploitation.

Published in the 1880s, Böhm-Bawerk's work was among the first to tackle the subject of interest while recognizing the significance of interest rates in the modern economy. His ideas would go on to inspire future works in the Austrian School of economics, influencing later thinkers such as Friedrich Hayek who elaborated upon related economic topics.

 

Contents

for the weakening of the motives of accumulation
49
Fanatical opposition of the elder Mirabeau 5354
53
The effect on theory
55
In short it explained Loan interest from Natural interest
58
This however is arguing in a circle Land is priced by dis
65
But must choose one or the other mode of calculation
67
His principal suggestionits necessity as an inducement to
71
3 Of the connection between profit and value
77
Speciousness of the argument
82
9798
99
Garnier Canard necessary and superfluous labour
105
CHAPTER I
111
CHAPTER II
120
The development after Say
126
Criticism Division of the theory into its two forms
132
The second formthat the increased product must contain
138
CHAPTER III
142
True if there is no saving of labour there is no profit but it
148
Carey a confused and blundering writer 154155
154
Peshine Smith repeats all Careys blunders with more than
161
In which we find 1 labour assisted by capital obtaining
168
In which he confuses 1 gross use with net use 2 the cap
171
Summary interest is the difference between the minuend
172
But in actual life how does the capitalist get paid for natural
175
Conspectus of the four interpretations of Capital is productive
180
CHAPTER I
185
Nebeniuss eclectic suggestions
192
In production besides the sacrifices of existent wealth material
198
Hermanns views on productivity
205
Menger who represents the highest point of the Use theory
209
CHAPTER IV
216
This is strictly an economic as well as a physical conception
221
Finally as material services constitute the economic substance
227
So also Schäffles functions of goods
233
Yet interest and sacrifice by no means invariably correspond
277
281282
282
CHAPTER III
288
200201
291
The English Group
297
And if interest is explained by these painful exertions why does
303
Difference between the two illustrated by a parallel case land
309
but might be justified as a political measure of expediency
310
An inevitable consequence of the Labourvalue theory
316
115
317
and cannot buy even his own product at what it cost him
322
that goods economically considered are
328
Surplus Value may conceivably be explained from productive
329
Nevertheless Rodbertus would not abolish rent
336
But as Rodbertus explains it he would have the labourer
342
343344
345
The only undertaker that could make a higher wage payment
351
which would involve that capital bears a rate of profit varying
357
His fundamental propositionthat goods exchange solely accord
367
Compared with Rodbertuss statement the most important point
375
As regards 3 is there no other possible common element such
382
And in goods that exchange is there always labour?
383
Later on Marx falls into all Rodbertuss mistakes such as claim
389
202204
390
CHAPTER I
395
parasitic profit
400
Jevons finding the function of capital in enabling the labourer
401
This is to identify surplus in products with surplus in value Pro
402
J S Mill includes profits among costs of production
408
206
410
Criticising Bastiats illustration he indicates that the cause
414
Looking at all this tangle of theories can we find the line
421
Next come those theories which use the external machinery of
427
Calvin and Molinaeus however stand almost alone in the six
429

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 378 - The real price of every thing, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it.
Page 72 - As soon as stock has accumulated in the hands of particular persons, some of them will naturally employ it in setting to work industrious people, whom they will supply with materials and subsistence, in order to make a profit by the sale of their work, or by what their labour adds to the value of the materials.
Page 381 - If among a nation of hunters, for example, it usually costs twice the labour to kill a beaver which it does to kill a deer, one beaver should naturally exchange for or be worth two deer. It is natural that what is usually the produce of two days...
Page 381 - In that early and rude state of society which precedes both the accumulation of stock and the appropriation of land, the proportion between the quantities of labour necessary for acquiring different objects seems to be the only circumstance which can afford any rule for exchanging them for one another.
Page 71 - In exchanging the complete manufacture either for money, for labour, or for other goods, over and above what may be sufficient to pay the price of the materials, and the wages of the workmen, something must be given for the profits of the undertaker of the work, who hazards his stock in this adventure.
Page 73 - In this state of things, the whole produce of labour belongs to the labourer; and the quantity of labour commonly employed in acquiring or producing any commodity, is the only circumstance which can regulate the quantity of labour which it ought commonly to purchase, command, or exchange for.
Page 317 - I think it will be but a very modest computation to say that of the products of the earth useful to the life of man, nine-tenths are the effects of labour...
Page 317 - Nor is it so strange as, perhaps, before consideration, it may appear, that the property of labour should be able to overbalance the community of land, for it is labour indeed that puts the difference of value on everything; and let any one consider what the difference is between an acre of land planted with tobacco or sugar, sown with wheat or barley, and an acre of the same land lying in common without any...
Page 411 - As the wages of the labourer are the remuneration of labour, so the profits of the capitalist are properly, according to Mr. Senior's well-chosen expression, the remuneration of abstinence. They are what he gains by forbearing to consume his capital for his own uses, and allowing it to be consumed by productive labourers for their uses. For this forbearance he requires a recompense.
Page 411 - The cause of profit is, that labour produces more than is required for its support. The reason why agricultural capital yields a profit, is because human beings can grow more food, than is necessary to feed them while it is being grown...

Bibliographic information