Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 29
Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy
Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1869 - Law reports, digests, etc
"With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies).
Other editions - View all
action affidavit agreement alleged amount answer appellant appellee assessment assigned auditor averment bill of exceptions Board of Commissioners Bunnel cause charge Circuit Court claim common law Common Pleas complaint consideration contract conveyance conveyed costs creditor damages debt decree deed defendant demurrer denial error Evansville evidence execution facts fee simple fenced filed fraud FRAZER Fulton county GREGORY held hundred dollars husband Indianapolis indictment interest issue J. W. Gordon J.-This Jeffersonville John Bunnel judge judgment is affirmed judgment is reversed jury land liable lots marriage ment mortgage motion notice overruled owner paid parol party payment person plaintiff pleaded proceedings promissory note Putnam County question Railroad Company real estate record recover refused rendered rule second paragraph sheriff sold statute statute of frauds sufficient suit surety sustained term thereof tion tract trial usurious verdict wife witness
Page 336 - The general assembly shall provide such revenue as may be needful by levying a tax, by valuation, so that every person and corporation shall pay a tax in proportion to the value of his, her or its property...
Page 332 - The General Assembly shall provide by law for a uniform and equal rate of assessment and taxation ; and shall prescribe such regulations as shall secure a just valuation for taxation of all property, both real and personal, excepting such only for municipal, educational, literary, scientific, religious or charitable purposes, as may be specially exempted by law.
Page 278 - The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which shall not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party, and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.
Page 209 - ... made with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors or other persons of their lawful suits, damages, forfeitures, debts or demands, and every bond or other evidence of debt given, suit commenced, decree or judgment suffered, with the like intent as against the persons so hindered, delayed or defrauded, shall be void.
Page 517 - Every act shall embrace but one subject, and matters properly connected therewith ; which subject shall be expressed in the title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act, which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be expressed in the title.
Page 56 - Any person may be made a defendant who has or claims an interest in the controversy, adverse to the plaintiff...
Page 549 - And any attempt by a mere colorable dispute to obtain the opinion of the court upon a question of law which a party desires to know for his own Interest or his own purposes...
Page 303 - The jury returned the following verdict: ''We, the jury, find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at $37,500.
Page 109 - It is a familiar canon of construction that a thing which is within the intention of the makers of a statute is as much within the statute as if it were within the letter; and a thing which is within the letter of the statute is not within the statute unless it be within the intention of the makers.