 | George Bentham - Logic - 1827 - 304 pages
...says, " When two terms agree with the same third" (understand term). Here he says, "if one extreme be compared to a part of the middle term, and another to the whole of it, they must have been compared to the same" (understand part of the middle term). expression with regard to the concordance... | |
 | Samuel Hinds (bp. of Norwich.) - Logic - 1827 - 190 pages
...premises ; (ie by being the subject of an universal, or predicate of a negative, part ii. § 2. p. 60.) and once is sufficient ; since if one extreme has been compared to apart of the middle term, and another to the whole of it, they must have been both compared to the... | |
 | Richard Whately - Logic - 1832 - 386 pages
...premises ; (ie by being the subject of an universal, or predicate of a negative, Chap. ii. § 2. p. 52,) and once is sufficient; since if one extreme has been...whole of it, they must have been both compared to the tame. 4th. No term must be distributed in the conclusion which was not distributed in one of the premises... | |
 | Charles Wesley - Logic - 1832 - 164 pages
...at least, in the premises ; ie hy being the subject of a universal, or predicate of a negative. Rule 4th. No term must be distributed in the conclusion, which was not distributed in one of the premises ; because you would then employ the whole of a term in the conclusion, when you had employed only a... | |
 | S. E. Parker - Logic - 1837 - 344 pages
...predicate, I neither, and E both." If the middle term be distributed in one of the premises it is enough, since if one extreme has been compared to a part of...it, they must have been both compared to the same third. 4. It is therefore not sufficient for a middle term to occur in a universal proposition; for... | |
 | S. E. PARKER - Logic - 1838 - 340 pages
...predicate, I neither, and E both." If the middle term be distributed in one of the premises it is enough, since if one extreme has been compared to a part of...it, they must have been both compared to the same third. 4. It is therefore not sufficient for a middle term to occur in a universal proposition; for... | |
 | Robert Simson (master of Colebrooke house acad, Islington.) - 1838 - 206 pages
...therefore Feathers are contrary to darkness. Is there any other rule respecting the other terms ? Yes; no term must be distributed in the conclusion which was not distributed in one of the premises. Why ? Because we should employ the whole of a term in the conclusion, when we had employed only a part... | |
 | Thomas Solly - Logic - 1839 - 192 pages
...minor premiss, and both subject and predicate in the conclusion. Hence it follows that either some term must be distributed in the conclusion which was not distributed in the premises, or else the middle term cannot be distributed in either premiss. We cannot therefore... | |
 | Charles Kittredge True - Logic - 1840 - 152 pages
...are complied with — for the two extremes are not compared to one and the same third. RULE 3. 103. No term must be distributed in the conclusion, which was not distributed in one of the premises. The following violates the rule : Some diseases are contagious ; No rheumatic.fevers are contagious... | |
 | M. A - 1848 - 878 pages
...minor premise, and tbe conclusion ; 3rd, the middle must at least once be distributed in the premises ; 4th, no term must be distributed in the conclusion which was not distributed in one of the premises ; 5th, from negative premises we can inter nothing I 6th, if one premise be negative, the conclusion... | |
| |
No term must be distributed in the conclusion which was not distributed in one of the premises. 
