Page images
PDF
EPUB

ture owing to the unnatural existing relations of po-

pulation and subsistence

CHAPTER XI.-POPULATION AND SUBSISTENCE.-History

of the supply of Food to an increasing People.-Early

limitation of the numbers and resources of Man.-

Hunting State.-Pastoral State.-Agricultural State.

-Increased facilities for procuring Subsistence con-

sequent on every Improvement.-Culture of inferior

Soils indicative of increased, not of diminished Re-

sources. Sure Resource of Migration.-Coloniza-

tion. Vast extent of rich Soil yet uncultivated.-Un-

limited capacity of the Globe for the production of

Food.-Misery the result of Crime and Folly, not of

any natural Law.-Food can easily be made to in-

crease faster than Population-as also Capital of every

kind. Folly, mischief, and impiety of the Malthusian

Doctrine.-True direction of prudence to the Increase

of Food and Wealth, not the limitation of numbers

and happiness

CHAPTER XII.-CAUSES OF POVERTY.-Mismanagement

of resources.-Faulty Institutions.-Economical struc-

ture and habits of nations.-Errors in all.-Preca-

rious position of the bulk of the British people.-His-

tory of the Labouring Class of Britain.-Liberty and

Pauperism coeval.—Origin, principle, means and re-

sults of the Poor-Law.-Prejudice against it.-Use

confounded with abuse.-Its mal-administration.-

Allowance System.-Reform of the Poor-Law.-Pro-

posed Commutation of Poor-Tax for compulsory Mu-

tual Assurance Fund.-Necessity of Poor-Law for

Ireland.-General Scheme of Emigration.-Summary

of means for extinguishing Pauperism

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE.

ON THE COINCIDENCE OF THE RIGHTS, DUTIES, AND INTERESTS OF MAN IN SOCIETY.

CHAPTER I.

Definition of Right-some Rule of Right necessary-Moral and Legal Rules of Right-should coincide with Natural Right-Rights and Duties correlative.

6

THE axiom, that whatever is is right,' has been said, sung, and upheld in various argument. But though perfectly true in the sense that Providence has, on the whole, ordered all things for the best, it is evidently false if applied to individual actions; as, for example, cruelty, theft, and murder. Providence, in arranging things on the whole for the best,' has left to man the liberty of acting on any occasion in a variety of ways; of all which but one only can be right, or 'for the best.'

[ocr errors]

6

In the conduct of man, therefore, and in the circumstances by which he surrounds himself, it seldom happens that what is ought to be, or is right.' Caprice often urges him in one direction, prejudice in another, selfishness in a third, sympathy in a fourth, fear in a fifth, habit in a sixth, while force perhaps supervenes and compels him to move in one totally distinct from all of

B

these. Yet in whatever way he may be led to act under the influence of such conflicting motives, there has been all along one, and but one, right course which he ought to have taken, which alone would have been for the best;' that is, as we interpret it, most for the welfare of mankind.'

[ocr errors]

Paley makes abstract or natural right to depend on the will of God, directly revealed, or deduced from His general intentions, as they are evidently displayed in His works. And for those who believe with Paley, as we most firmly do, that God wills the greatest attainable happiness of his sentient creatures, and especially of mankind, the will of God becomes an additional and most powerful sanction of the right' in the sense here assigned to it. But whether it can be proved or not to the satisfaction of every one, by the evidence of natural or revealed religion, that the Creator does will the greatest attainable happiness of mankind in this world, it must remain selfevident to every reasonable mind, and will probably be disputed by none, that whatever course of conduct makes most for the happiness of mankind is, abstractedly, for the best,' or right in man. Abstract right, therefore, or, in other words, natural justice, may be defined as that disposition of the circumstances within his power by man, which is most for the welfare of mankind.'

Throughout all ages and nations there has been more or less of direct reference to the good of mankind, the happiness of society, the public welfare, and similar phrases, as the standard of right and justice. And both the moral rules which have been suggested at various periods by the best and

« PreviousContinue »