...children for property. Of course children are not "things".' unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to...2wl (Italics in the original) Locke's statement could be a foundation for a property right in...

...we would be without it. 9. Locke says: "No man but he can have a right to what that [viz. his labor] is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good, left for others." Second Treatise, ^f27, p. 288. 10. 'As much as any one can make use of to any advantage...

...thereby makes it his Property. . . For this Labour being the un-questionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough and as good left in common for others.162 Viewed independently...

...excludes the common right of other Men. For this labour being the unquestionable Property of the labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. . . . Thus this Law...

...excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others." 34 KRAMER, Matthew...

...excludes the common right of other men. For this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined.9 [Emphasis added] The above serves only as a starting point. Locke applies his theory only...

...unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what this is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. (Locke 1960:287-289) Locke's narrative employed synecdoche, or part for all (labor for human), as well...