...v. United States: "There is no public interest in permitting certain kinds of utterances, the 'ffi and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or fighting words — ii-.»* which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate kreadi of the...

...in my State. Our United States Supreme Court declared in 315 US 568 : There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention...of the peace. It has been well observed that such are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to...

...in my State. Our United States Supreme Court declared in 315 US 568 : There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention...of the peace. It has been well observed that such are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to...

...Supreme Court in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 US 568 (1942), said : "There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention...of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as...

...remark is addressed."132 The Court sustained the conviction. It reasoned: There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention...have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem.These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting"...

...1942, the high court laid down a standard that is still valid today: There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention...have never been thought to raise any constitutional problems. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or 'fighting'...

...prevailed against local sanctions on free, speech grounds — the Court cited "certain well,defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention...have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problems." Along with "the lewd and obscene, the profane. . . .and the insulting or 'fighting' words"...

...is directed at the masses and not to a specific individnal. Words directed at a specific individnal "which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace" are "fighting words" and not protected by the First Amendment iChaplinsky r New Hampshire, 1942, p....

...Paul,4 the Court extended its prohibition of content discrimination to 'fighting words', defmed as "those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace',5 It was previously established doctrine that fighting words merited a lesser degree of First...

...lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words — those words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.51 In his influential treatise, Tribe criticized the Court for relying on the "persistent" but...