...Labour with, and joyned to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his Property. . . For this Labour being the un-questionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough and as good left in common for others.162 Viewed independently...

...the dominion of him who created it. Such ownership 'excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others'.17 Locke thus...

...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men. For this lt in practice than it may in contemplation appear....Some difficulties however, and some additional expen once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others. 28. He that...

...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this labour being the unquestionable Property of the labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. . . . Thus this...

...it hath by this labour something annexed to it that excludes the common right of other men. For this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined.9 [Emphasis added] The above serves only as a starting point. Locke applies his theory...

...their children. Yet we do not mistake children for property. Of course children are not "things".' unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to...2wl (Italics in the original) Locke's statement could be a foundation for a property...

...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to 94 Hamilton (n 78 above) 867. 95 In Millar v Taylor the court applies a natural law theory to copyright...

...excludes the common right of other men. For this labor being the unquestionable property of the laborer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough and as good left in common for others. 28. He that is...

...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what this is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. (Locke...