For this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. Principles of Political Economy - Page 19by George Poulett Scrope - 1833 - 457 pagesFull view - About this book
| Ilias Bantekas, John Paterson, Maidan Suleimanov, Ma?dan Kontuarovich Sule?menov - Law - 2004 - 546 pages
...it hath by this labour something annexed to it that excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others.4 However, there... | |
| Martin Senftleben - Law - 2004 - 358 pages
...theoretical example given by Locke,193 is of paramount importance with regard to a further proviso of Locke: 'Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough and as good left in common for others.'194 Obviously,... | |
| Matthew H. Kramer - Business & Economics - 2004 - 368 pages
...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. (TTG, II, §27,... | |
| Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller, Jeffrey Paul - Law - 2005 - 428 pages
...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others.20 This argument... | |
| 江先声 - 2004 - 127 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| Oliver J. Thatcher - History - 2004 - 466 pages
...hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men. For this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others. He that... | |
| |