...maker' had imposed a law of nature upon the state of nature which was a source of absolute obligation: 'And reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind...another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions' (Locke, 1993 [1689]: 263-4). The right to life or liberty might be cancelled out by a crime and the...

...American, and French revolutions. The words of the philosopher John Locke in 1 664 were that reason "teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that...another in his life, health, liberty or possessions." These words justified the "bloodless English revolution" of 1 688, which finally ended the absolutism...

...fiduciary arrangement. This is because people are rational and because "Reason," in Locke's words, "teaches all Mankind, who will but consult it, that...ought to harm another in his Life, Health, Liberty or Possessions."4 Locke's doctrine of natural rights and FEN OSLER HAMPSON AND DAVID MENDELOFF his views...

...in line with something like a "law of nature," one, as Locke has it, "which obliges everyone . . . that being all equal and independent, no one ought...another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions." 28 As a result of these assumptions, states composed of reasonably contented individuals will (1) cooperate,...

...Judicious Hooker," took the existence of Natural Law as a given and described its central principle as "that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his Life, Health, Liberty or Possessions."5 Both in Tvm Treatises and in Letters on Toleration Locke declared that people had natural...

...contained in the statement I quoted earlier from *\6. These read as follows: (a) The first clause: "being all equal and independent, no one ought to...another in his Life, Health, Liberty, or Possessions." (b) The second clause: "Every one as he is bound to preserve himself, and not to quit his Station willfully;...

...AUTHORITY AND THE DEMOCRACY/JURY ANALOGY 1. See chapter 3, "An Acceptability Requirement." 2. Locke writes: "no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions" (see Locke 1980, 9 [chap. II, §6]). 3. Elsewhere, I explore the implications of the anti-reverse-vigilante...

...moral values according to natural law, which is reason.44 And the process of reasoning reveals that "no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions."45 Furthermore, citizens who are encouraged to use reason to search for moral truths will...

...license. Reason is one of the laws of nature, and it teaches that, if men are all equal and indeIK-mU'iit, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or liossessions. Next to the preservation of himself, the natural law wills Uiat each shall aid in the...

...because of competing interests. The more moderate Locke believed that "the state of nature has a law to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason,...ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions."17 The sanguine Rousseau argued that "above all we shall not conclude with Hobbes that...